What do we hold allegiance to, the site or the intervention? i.e. in the Public meets Private debate which is primary?
Do we post an open invitation into the intervention process? renegade art?
(this posses the problem of inviting vandalism)
What about staging an impromptu memorial of some kind and inviting people to contribute personal artifacts?
What are the possibilities for the roll of failure in out work?
Does an intervention have to be seen? If the aftermath is not visable should, then, the process be? If a tree falls in the forest...
What about the site as a platform for communication? Is art communication?
If so 1>who are we trying to communicate with? Massey? Each Other? Only the staff in charge of keeping the space clean?
2> what are we trying to communicate?
Are we interested in the historical, architectural, or situational contexts of the space?
What is the roll of colour in the space, or in our work?
No comments:
Post a Comment